Within a few days, plaintiff perfected an appeal to this court from the judgments of the trial of January 17, January 24, and February 14, 1953. The trial court heard this motion and on February 14, 1953, denied it. In her motion the plaintiff pointed out no error of the trial court and did not ask for a new trial. Within three days the plaintiff filed her motion that the judgment be set aside and that the trial court reconsider the right of plaintiff to have the full right, title and interest in their present home and to have judgment against the defendant for permanent alimony. On January 24, 1953, the trial court adjudged that plaintiff should be awarded $1,250 as restoration to her of property owned by her at the time of marriage, to be a lien upon real estate owned by the parties (homestead) and that subject to that lien each party was awarded a one-half interest in the real estate, and in the event of a sale, she should have a lien of $1,250 and the parties should have the balance in equal shares. On the issues thus framed a trial was had following which judgment was rendered on January 17, 1953, awarding a divorce to plaintiff, who was given the custody of the minor child, for whose support provision was made, and the household furniture, and reserving the question of "division of property and alimony" for one week. The defendant filed an answer and cross petition. This was an action in which the plaintiff sought a divorce, custody of a minor child, division of property and alimony. *423 The opinion of the court was delivered by: Mitchell, of Hutchinson, Kansas, was with him on the brief for the appellant. Lewis Oswald, of Hutchinson, Kansas, argued the cause, and William L.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |